Articles

A lot of people seem to be under the impression that Firecracker is a competing technology against unikernels. It actually isn’t. It’s more of an alternative to existing machine monitors such as qemu and is actually complementary if you need the quick boot times. As for isolation levels you are going to have about the same isolation as you would get with KVM – it uses the same facilities underneath.

OSv was the first unikernel to have support for Firecracker but now Nanos has support as well.

Source de l’article sur DZONE