Fargate vs Lambda : Qui sera le vainqueur ?

Fargate et Lambda sont deux technologies très populaires parmi les développeurs cloud. Quel est le meilleur pour votre projet ? Découvrons qui sera le vainqueur !

## Comparaison Fargate vs Lambda dans l’espace sans serveur

Quelles sont les différences entre Fargate et Lambda ?

Fargate et Lambda sont deux options de calcul sans serveur populaires disponibles dans l’écosystème AWS. Bien que les deux outils offrent un calcul sans serveur, ils diffèrent en ce qui concerne les cas d’utilisation, les limites opérationnelles, les allocations de ressources d’exécution, le prix et les performances. Fargate est une moteur de calcul sans serveur proposé par Amazon qui vous permet de gérer efficacement les conteneurs sans les tracas de la mise en provision des serveurs et de l’infrastructure sous-jacente. Lambda, quant à lui, est une plateforme de calcul sans serveur qui vous permet d’exécuter du code sans avoir à gérer des serveurs. Lambda est conçu pour prendre en charge des charges de travail à courtes durées et à faible consommation de ressources.

Quelle est la meilleure option pour l’architecture ?

Lorsqu’il s’agit de choisir entre Fargate et Lambda, il est important de comprendre leurs différences et leurs avantages. Pour les applications à longue durée et à haute consommation de ressources, Fargate est la meilleure option car il offre une gestion des conteneurs plus efficace et une meilleure performance. Cependant, pour les applications à courtes durées et à faible consommation de ressources, Lambda est la meilleure option car il offre une exécution plus rapide et une meilleure utilisation des ressources. En fin de compte, le choix entre Fargate et Lambda dépend des exigences spécifiques de votre application et de votre architecture. Il est important de prendre en compte le coût, la performance et les fonctionnalités avant de prendre une décision finale.

Quelle que soit l’application ou l’architecture que vous souhaitez mettre en place, Fargate et Lambda sont tous deux des outils puissants qui peuvent vous aider à atteindre vos objectifs. En tant qu’informaticien enthousiaste, je trouve que ces outils sont très utiles pour créer des applications modernes et évolutives. Fargate et Lambda offrent tous les deux des fonctionnalités avancées qui peuvent être utilisées pour créer des architectures robustes et flexibles. Les deux outils sont faciles à utiliser et peuvent être intégrés à d’autres services AWS pour offrir une expérience utilisateur optimale. En fin de compte, le choix entre Fargate et Lambda dépendra des exigences spécifiques de votre application et de votre architecture.

Source de l’article sur DZONE

The internet ecosystem is currently shifting significantly with the dawn of decentralization. More and more decentralized technologies are becoming mainstream and gaining acceptance by the world at large.

As far as innovation and development is concerned, the startup way of doing things has prevailed. While more prominent companies have tried to get into the space, none of their projects has been groundbreaking regarding their usage. Startups have the upper edge, with many creating successful businesses like, Alchemy, and IPFS/filecoin (Protocol Labs).

Source de l’article sur DZONE

I’m still working on learning Rust. Beyond syntax, learning a language requires familiarizing oneself with its idioms and ecosystem. I’m at a point where I want to explore testing in Rust.

The Initial Problem

We have used Dependency Injection a lot – for ages on the JVM. Even if you’re not using a framework, Dependency Injection helps decouple components. Here’s a basic example:

Source de l’article sur DZONE

There were mixed reactions on Thursday morning when Adobe announced it had acquired Figma.

Excited press releases extolling the benefits of the “collaboration” followed the news. Dylan Field, founder and CEO of Figma, said: “There is a huge opportunity for us to accelerate the growth and innovation of the Figma platform with access to Adobe’s technology…”

The reaction from the design community has been a little less enthusiastic.

The problem for the design industry is that we’ve been here before. The acquisition of Macromedia followed a period in which Adobe tried to compete, failed to update its legacy code, lost the battle, and purchased the victor. You only need to look at the number of former Macromedia products in Adobe’s stable (zero) to see where Figma’s heading.

Figma has grown faster than any of its rivals in the last eight years. It is, of course, easier to grow when you start at zero. But there’s no denying Figma is a well-managed business and probably a good investment — if not worth the $20bn that Adobe reportedly paid.

Figma’s technology will give Adobe a leg-up in the collaborative design stakes, where it is clearly lacking. And Adobe’s resources will iron out some of the kinks in Figma, especially around typography, which is, if we’re honest, a bit hacky in places.

Adobe will provide a good home (we hope) for the Figma team, who will have the opportunity for career advancement in a much wider pool of development teams.

And, of course, Figma’s annual revenue will begin to trickle into Adobe’s vault — although it may be some time before it makes a dent in that $20bn hole.

But Adobe didn’t buy Figma for its business model, collaborative technology, team, or revenue stream. Adobe bought Figma’s users, all four million of them.

Adobe‘s approach to design software is upselling. It lures you in with free apps, and when you’re engaged, it integrates them with other parts of its ecosystem until suddenly, without meaning to, you’ve agreed to a Creative Cloud subscription.

Adobe was losing customers to a competitor. And more importantly, due to Figma’s free-use approach for individuals, it was losing young customers to a competitor. If it hadn’t bought Figma, Adobe would have needed to invest heavily in its own products while providing them to freelancers for free; that isn’t viable for a company with as many commitments as Adobe.

Yes, it is entirely accurate to say that competition drives innovation, and with fewer competing apps, there is less need for companies like Adobe to build high-quality, reliable products. However, it is also true to say that a lack of competition creates opportunities for new apps.

Somewhere out there, in a dorm room, or a basement, or on a kitchen table, someone is working on Adobe’s next big acquisition. It’s probably an AR design app; we need a few more of those.

For Figma, the next 12 months will be bright as Adobe works to retain the customers it’s bought. Within five years, you’ll probably need an Adobe Fonts subscription and a Photoshop plugin to use Figma. In ten years, it will be stored in a code archive next to Freehand.

Some designers will turn to Sketch; others will turn to Affinity; some will shrug and keep using Figma; others will shrug and keep using XD.

If an app is intrinsic to your design work, it’s probably time to switch apps. Your skills are transferable. I’ve switched apps many times; some I loved, some I just needed. I’ve never encountered an app that improved my work, although plenty have improved my mood while working.

Figma took a great approach and will continue to be great until it isn’t. Tools come and go, Adobe’s acquisitions team, it appears, is eternal.



Featured image uses photos by Afrika ufundi, Andrea Piacquadio, Andrea Piacquadio, Anna Tarazevich, cottonbro, fauxels, Ketut Subiyanto, Mikhail Nilov, Moose Photos, Pavel Danilyuk, Pavel Danilyuk, Polina Tankilevitch, Tima Miroshnichenko.


The post Adobe Has Acquired You first appeared on Webdesigner Depot.

Source de l’article sur Webdesignerdepot

It’s 2022, and React has a huge ecosystem to help developers bring complex UIs to life faster. Furthermore, with the extensive support of ReactJS libraries, there is hardly any case when a developer has to build a component from scratch.

However, not every ReactJS UI developer is aware of the best practices to build UIs faster in ReactJS. Therefore, I’ll be discussing the top five approaches (which I personally use) for building UIs quicker in a ReactJS project. So without further ado, let’s get started:

Source de l’article sur DZONE

We wanted to share our findings and experiences from creating our first GitHub Action. In this article, you’ll learn how to write a simple GitHub Action in Python.

Brief Overview of GitHub Actions

In 2019, GitHub released its own CI tool called GitHub Actions. According to GitHub, Actions make it easy for developers to automate tasks within the software development life cycle (SDLC). The native ecosystem integration enables projects to be automated from the moment developers commit code for deployment into production.

Source de l’article sur DZONE

WordPress 6.0 has been released, and another niche jazz musician will be enjoying extra Spotify royalties next month.

WordPress 6, named for latin-jazz musician Arturo O’Farrill, is the realization of a change of direction the WordPress Foundation adopted several years ago.

All versions of WordPress now power around 42% of the web. That’s approximately 810,000,000 sites. If you looked at each site for a single second, without pausing to blink, it would take you over 25 years to see the home page of each one — of course, if you factor in how long a typical WordPress site takes to load it would take well over a century.

Some people (i.e., me) have been predicting the decline of WordPress for so long that sooner or later, we were bound to be correct. And, despite its astonishing reach, there are some signs that its market share may now be in decline. Even the W3C abandoned it in favor of Craft.

Of the 1,930,000,000 sites that currently make up the web, only around 400,000,000 are active. WordPress’s long-term dominance, coupled with a stalling market share, means that a disproportionate number of abandoned sites are WordPress. With site builders like Wix, Squarespace, and Shopify taking huge chunks of WordPress’ share of new sites, WordPress is facing something of a cliff edge.

What the ill-informed naysayers (i.e., me) hadn’t counted on was that WordPress had already seen the writing on the wall and formulated a plan…

WordPress’s problem has always been its legacy code; supporting out-of-date ideas and a spaghetti-like codebase has meant a great deal of work to do anything new. As a result, the last few releases have seen great ideas stifled by labored implementation. Even the most loyal WordPress user has to admit that Gutenberg, while filled with potential, doesn’t work the way it should. However, with WordPress 6, all the work may be starting to pay off.

With version 6, the block editor in WordPress is starting to feel like a design tool that, if not perfect, is at least usable. Editing content no longer feels like you’re fighting against the UI. Most importantly, the bar for creating a site is much, much lower. WordPress 6 also offers improved performance and accessibility, both areas that have traditionally been lacking. Security is still something of an issue, but that is mainly due to the ROI for hackers that massive market shares generate.

WordPress, it seems, has arrived at two conclusions: its main competition isn’t other CMS but other site builders. To maintain its market dominance, it needs to cater not to professionals but to amateurs.

Don’t get me wrong; the WordPress ecosystem will benefit from WordPress 6, at least reputationally. New sites run by amateurs eventually become established sites run by, if not professionals, then at least knowledgeable amateurs.

OK, so WordPress probably isn’t a good choice for enterprise sites. And there are certainly better options for ecommerce. And as for SEO, well, probably best not mentioned.

But in WordPress 6, we have a free, open-source site builder that lowers the bar for making a new site. It’s a credit to the community that has persevered to produce it.


The post WordPress 6.0 Lives Up To The Hype first appeared on Webdesigner Depot.

Source de l’article sur Webdesignerdepot

For decades, developers have struggled with optimizing persistence layer implementation in terms of storing business data, retrieving relevant data quickly, and — most importantly — simplifying data transaction logic regardless of programming languages.

Fortunately, this challenge triggered the invention of Java ecosystems in which developers can implement the Java Persistence API (JPA). For instance, Hibernate Object-Relational Mapper (ORM) with Panache is the standard framework for JPA implementation in the Java ecosystem.

Source de l’article sur DZONE