A domain name is an essential element of every project, product, and company. It’s central to a brand and has a disproportionately large impact on user experience. Not only that, but it also impacts SEO and ultimately revenue.
Domain names are also one of the most commonly retailed elements in web technology, with most designers hoarding a small empire’s worth of domain names “just in case” the right side-project comes along.
Because so much of the information and advice on domain names is provided by companies selling domain names and is therefore not impartial, we wanted to bust some of the myths you’ll encounter.
Myth 1: Anyone Can Own a Domain Name
In fact, almost no one can own a domain name. As demonstrated by the (probably) annual renewal notices you receive, you are merely renting a domain name.
You pay a registrar, who registers the domain with ICANN (The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) — or an entity to whom ICANN has delegated the responsibility for a particular TLD.
Even when renting a domain, you do not have the right to use it; thousands of UK-based businesses have had .eu domains stripped from them as a result of being removed from the EU.
Myth 2: There’s a Perfect Domain For Every Project
Domains do not have inherent value; they acquire value over time.
25 years ago, if you were building a search engine, the ‘perfect’ domain might have been search.com, find.com, or perhaps look.com — the particularly cynical might have opted for webads.com. You almost certainly wouldn’t have registered google.com because it says nothing about search.
Any domain name can acquire value through longevity, SEO, and branding
google.com acquired its value through a simple, relentless branding strategy and a generous dollop of luck.
Any domain name can acquire value through longevity, SEO, and branding.
Myth 3: Your Domain Name Should Contain Keywords
If you’re at the point of registering a domain name, either your business is new, or your digital strategy is. In either case, you have hopefully carried out keyword research, but without a live site, your keyword research hasn’t been validated. In other words, you don’t know what your keywords are.
Even if you’re confident that you know exactly what your keywords should be at this time, your keywords may change. The pandemic has required most businesses to pivot to some degree. eatoutny.com isn’t much use if legal restrictions have forced you to switch to a delivery business — unless you’ve also registered eatinny.com.
Furthermore, in the area of ecommerce, customers tend to view keyword-heavy domain names as budget options because they are like generic-brand goods. It may be that your business will only ever be a budget option, but it’s not a wise business decision to restrict your options.
There is an SEO benefit to keywords in a domain, but it is minimal and will almost certainly vanish in the next few years — even for EMD (Exact Match Domains) — because it is too close to gaming the system.
Myth 4: You Don’t Need a .com
As frustrating as it may be to seek out a .com you’re happy with, nothing says “late to the party” like a .biz domain.
A .co extension is slightly better in some regions because the .co.** format is commonly used; .co.jp for example. However, .co tends to be typed as .com by users accustomed to the more common format.
nothing says “late to the party” like a .biz domain
It’s possible to opt for pun-based names using regionally specific TLDs like buy.it, or join.in. This kind of strategy will play havoc with your local search strategy because computers don’t understand puns; you’ll potentially do quite well in Italy or India, though.
If you’re registering a domain for a non-profit, then .org is perfectly acceptable. However, carefully consider whether a domain is worth the lost traffic if you can’t also register the .com (because people will type .com).
The one exception is industry-specific TLDs that communicate something about the domain’s contents to a target demographic. For example, .design is a great extension for designers, and .io is fine for an app if it targets developers (i.e., people who understand the joke). You should also register the .com if you can, and if you can’t, carefully consider whom you’re likely to be competing with for SERPs.
This is not to say that anything other than a .com is worthless, just worth less than the .com.
Myth 5: A Trademark Entitles You to Register a Domain
Trademark registration and domain registration are two entirely different processes, and one does not entitle you to the other. This has been legally challenged a few times and fails far more often than it succeeds.
Trademarks are rarely blanket registrations, which means the trademark owner needs to declare the industry in which it will operate; there was no enmity between Apple Inc. and Apple Corp Ltd. until the former moved into music publishing and no one could download the White Album onto their iPod.
There is, however, a limited value in registering a domain that has been trademarked elsewhere. Not least because you will be competing against their SEO, and if they’re big enough to trademark a name, they’ve probably grabbed the .com.
Myth 6: Premium Domains Are a Good Investment
Premium domains are domains that have been speculatively registered in the hope of attracting a huge resale fee. The process is commonly referred to as ‘domain squatting.’
Domain squatters bulk-register domains in the hope that one of them will be valuable to someone. As a result, they are forced to charge exorbitant fees to cover their losses; a premium domain will cost anything from 1000–100,000% of the actual registration cost.
Setting aside the cost — which would be better spent on marketing — premium domains often come with legacy issues, such as a troubled search engine history, that you do not want to inherit.
Myth 7: A Matching Handle Must be Available on Social Media
The business value of a social media account varies from company to company and from platform to platform. Even if it is valuable to you, numerous marketing strategies will accommodate a domain name: prepending with ‘use,’ or ‘get,’ or appending with ‘hq,’ for example.
More importantly, it’s unwise to allow a third-party to define your long-term brand identity; sure, Facebook is huge now, but then so was the T-Rex.
Myth 8: You Need a Domain Name
A domain name is an alias, nothing more. You don’t actually need a domain name — what you need is an IP address, which a domain name makes human-friendly.
Think of domain names as an accessibility issue; humans are less able to read IP addresses than computers, and domains bridge the gap. (See how helpful accessibility is?)
While a domain name is beneficial, question whether a sub-domain or even an IP address would do. Registering a domain is an exciting stage of a project that many people never get past, leaving themselves with a huge collection of domains that they pay an annual fee for, and never actually develop.
What Makes a Good Domain Name
Now we’ve dispelled some of the myths surrounding domain names, let’s look at the key characteristics shared by good domain names:
A Good Domain Name is Brandable
A brandable domain is non-generic. It’s the difference between a sticky-plaster and a band-aid. Unique is good, rare is acceptable, generic is a waste of money.
A Good Domain Name is Flexible
Keep it flexible. Don’t tie yourself to one market or one demographic. Your domain name needs to work now and fifty years in the future.
A Good Domain Name is Musical
Six to 12 characters and two to three syllables is the sweet spot. Names in that range have a musical rhythm our brains find it easier to retain and recall.
A Good Domain Name is Phonetic
There are 44 word sounds in the English language. Other languages have similar totals. If you use a domain name that is pronounced phonetically, it will be easy to communicate.
Source
The post 8 Domain Name Myths Every Web Designer Should Know first appeared on Webdesigner Depot.
Source de l’article sur Webdesignerdepot
Le Patch Management : un incontournable de la cybersécurité
Actualités, Sécurité de l'information et du SI, Sécurité de l’information, Sécurité du système d’informationProtéger son parc informatique contre des intrusions et autres attaques est plus que jamais un élément clé que les entreprises et organisations de toutes tailles doivent intégrer comme une priorité stratégique. A priori évident, on constate pourtant que nombre d’acteurs éprouvent des difficultés pour sécuriser efficacement leur parc IT.
The post Le Patch Management : un incontournable de la cybersécurité first appeared on UnderNews.
Source de l’article sur UNDERNEWS
Poll: Is It Time to Merge Browser Engines Into a Browser Protocol?
Actualités, ActualitésWe tend not to think about it, but the Internet has a physical dimension. It’s a complex network of wires, cables, servers, and technical odds and ends — if you really want to, you can track it down; doing so is particularly easy on small islands because there tends to be a single cable tethering the region to the wider world.
Those physical cables run all the way to your building, and although an ISP manages them, they are normally rented from public bodies as part of your national infrastructure.
Beyond the physical, international bodies govern protocols like ARP, IEEE, HTTP, NTP, FTP, and others, which control how data is transmitted through the network and keep everything playing nice.
Then, at the other end of the equation, there’s your device. It may be a phone, a tablet, a notebook, a desktop. It’s probably several of these. And because it’s your device, everything on it feels like yours. We tend to think of it as our method of accessing the Internet instead of being part of the Internet — in reality, it’s both.
On your device, the software you use to access the Internet is your browser. For 65% of people, that’s Chrome. Even if you’re reading this on Edge, it’s created with the Blink engine, an extension of Chromium, which is the basis for Chrome. In fact, almost every browser is built using a variation of Chromium, except those on Apple devices that require Apple’s own WebKit to be used instead.
Chromium is ostensibly open-source. WebKit is not, but both are geared towards their primary contributors’ business goals; neither Chromium nor WebKit will make a change that negatively impacts Alphabet or Apple.
Your browser is just a copy of a pre-compiled set of source files sat in a Git repo somewhere. You may have installed a few plugins in your browser. You may have bookmarked a few pages. You’ve probably moved it to your dock or your home screen. Those features are just nice add-ons for the GUI; what really matters is what decisions are made about how to render web technologies.
Imagine a world in which every single car used the same mid-range Ford engine. Add in a stereo, and paint it any color you like, you can even pick your own tires, but under the hood, it has to be that mid-range Ford engine. And the only justification is that it’s too much work to create an alternative.
The 2020s are going to be a time of enormous change. You can smell the panic in traditional banking sectors every time Cryptocurrency is mentioned. Real estate billionaires are desperately trying to get us back into offices we don’t want to return to. And yes, I’m sorry, but the climate crisis is looming, and it will force our hand. The values of a whole generation have been rapidly reassessed. Innovation and the potential for innovation are rife, except, ironically, on the Internet, where we’re still chugging away with the mid-range Ford engine under the hood.
The web has reached the point at which the browser engines we choose define real-world infrastructure. There’s a fork in the road: either browser engines are part of an infrastructure that should be rationalized into a single browser protocol, or alternative browser engines need to be nurtured, encouraged, and accessible by choice.
Featured image via Pexels.
Source
The post Poll: Is It Time to Merge Browser Engines Into a Browser Protocol? first appeared on Webdesigner Depot.
Source de l’article sur Webdesignerdepot
La seule constante est le changement
Actualités, ERP & Applications, Innovation, SAPNous entendons souvent des analystes conseiller aux entreprises de repenser, réorganiser ou même complètement transformer leurs business models.
Mais qu’est-ce que cela signifie concrètement ? Est-ce pertinent pour tous les types de produits, y compris les miens, qui ont toujours été vendus de la même manière aux clients ?
Les exemples de business models transformés et couronnés de succès sont nombreux et connus de tous :
Et certains de ces « nouveaux business models » ont non seulement remplacé les « business models traditionnels », mais aussi offert une place à de nouveaux acteurs sur le marché. Des startups inconnues ont silencieusement attaqué des marques bien connues, les contraignant à une position défensive.
Et l’histoire récente montre que ces modèles de consommation sont bien acceptés par les clients. Ce n’est plus seulement la qualité des produits qui compte, mais aussi le mode de consommation, le service et la fiabilité associés.
Envisager et tester des changements et des orientations complètement différentes en matière d’offres est vraiment une excellente idée. Il s’agit non seulement d’innover en matière de produits physiques et de fonctionnalités, mais aussi de façonner quelque chose de nouveau : un nouveau produit offrant une perspective étendue et une valeur accrue aux clients, avant que d’autres ne s’en chargent.
Mais il faudra pour cela surmonter un obstacle, lié au fait qu’un business model transformé à ce point changera non seulement la vie des clients, mais aussi votre entreprise, et ce par bien des aspects :
Il s’agit vraiment d’un changement complet de business model !
Bonne nouvelle : chez SAP, nous disposons non seulement de l’expertise nécessaire pour vous aider, mais aussi de solutions et de processus standardisés. Nombre de nos clients ont réussi à transformer leur entreprise et à se protéger vis-à-vis de nouveaux acteurs. Ils ont prouvé que c’était possible et sont parvenus à garder une longueur d’avance en matière d’innovation de business model.
Autre bonne nouvelle : les clients qui ont doté leur entreprise traditionnelle d’un business model moderne sont devenus plus forts et plus résilients face aux crises, quelles qu’elles soient. Ce n’est pas la seule raison qui doit vous pousser à penser autrement, et ce dès maintenant, mais il s’agit clairement d’un argument de poids.
Vous souhaitez obtenir les témoignages de nos clients et experts ?
Rejoignez-nous pour notre présentation BRIM (1), proposée dans le cadre du sommet virtuel SAP Finance and Risk, et découvrez les expériences et idées de nos clients et experts à travers leurs témoignages.
Nous sommes impatients de vous retrouver le 16 mars.
(1) BRIM est l’acronyme de Billing Revenue Innovation Management, pour gestion novatrice de la facturation et des revenus
The post La seule constante est le changement appeared first on SAP France News.
Source de l’article sur sap.com
The Most Common Types of Cybercrime
Actualités, Méthodes et organisation des process ITIntroduction
People are trading convenience for privacy in today’s digital world – which means they share more and more information about themselves. While one-click checkouts and saved passwords can all be appreciated, that mental « autopilot » can sometimes steer us wrong. While we were all once wary of anyone asking for information about ourselves, we now assume that it’s just the cost of participation —you’re asking for my favorite book, I’m giving it to you; you’re sending me an email from my boss, and you’re getting my attention and reaction. But this autopilot is what cybercriminals and hackers from people like you and me around the world effortlessly turn into hundreds of millions of dollars every year. In this article, we will discuss the definition and types of cybercrime and available cybersecurity courses.
What Is Cybercrime?
Cybercrime is a crime that either attacks or exploits a computer, a computer network, or a networked system. Cybercrime is mainly, but not always, committed by cybercriminals or hackers who want to make money — people or organizations are carrying out cybercrime. Any cybercriminals that are coordinated are extremely technically trained and use sophisticated techniques. Others are hacking novices. In extreme cases, for reasons other than personal gain, cybercrime attempts to hurt computers. This may be political or personal.
Source de l’article sur DZONE
Researchers Unveil New Linux Malware Linked to Chinese Hackers
Actualités, Sécurité de l'information et du SI, Sécurité de l’information, Sécurité du système d’informationCybersecurity researchers on Wednesday shed light on a new sophisticated backdoor targeting Linux endpoints and servers that’s believed to be the work of Chinese nation-state actors.
Dubbed « RedXOR » by Intezer, the backdoor masquerades as a polkit daemon, with similarities found between the malware and those previously associated with the Winnti Umbrella (or Axiom) threat group such as PWNLNX,
Source de l’article sur The Hacker News
8 Domain Name Myths Every Web Designer Should Know
Actualités, ActualitésA domain name is an essential element of every project, product, and company. It’s central to a brand and has a disproportionately large impact on user experience. Not only that, but it also impacts SEO and ultimately revenue.
Domain names are also one of the most commonly retailed elements in web technology, with most designers hoarding a small empire’s worth of domain names “just in case” the right side-project comes along.
Because so much of the information and advice on domain names is provided by companies selling domain names and is therefore not impartial, we wanted to bust some of the myths you’ll encounter.
Myth 1: Anyone Can Own a Domain Name
In fact, almost no one can own a domain name. As demonstrated by the (probably) annual renewal notices you receive, you are merely renting a domain name.
You pay a registrar, who registers the domain with ICANN (The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) — or an entity to whom ICANN has delegated the responsibility for a particular TLD.
Even when renting a domain, you do not have the right to use it; thousands of UK-based businesses have had .eu domains stripped from them as a result of being removed from the EU.
Myth 2: There’s a Perfect Domain For Every Project
Domains do not have inherent value; they acquire value over time.
25 years ago, if you were building a search engine, the ‘perfect’ domain might have been search.com, find.com, or perhaps look.com — the particularly cynical might have opted for webads.com. You almost certainly wouldn’t have registered google.com because it says nothing about search.
Any domain name can acquire value through longevity, SEO, and branding
google.com acquired its value through a simple, relentless branding strategy and a generous dollop of luck.
Any domain name can acquire value through longevity, SEO, and branding.
Myth 3: Your Domain Name Should Contain Keywords
If you’re at the point of registering a domain name, either your business is new, or your digital strategy is. In either case, you have hopefully carried out keyword research, but without a live site, your keyword research hasn’t been validated. In other words, you don’t know what your keywords are.
Even if you’re confident that you know exactly what your keywords should be at this time, your keywords may change. The pandemic has required most businesses to pivot to some degree. eatoutny.com isn’t much use if legal restrictions have forced you to switch to a delivery business — unless you’ve also registered eatinny.com.
Furthermore, in the area of ecommerce, customers tend to view keyword-heavy domain names as budget options because they are like generic-brand goods. It may be that your business will only ever be a budget option, but it’s not a wise business decision to restrict your options.
There is an SEO benefit to keywords in a domain, but it is minimal and will almost certainly vanish in the next few years — even for EMD (Exact Match Domains) — because it is too close to gaming the system.
Myth 4: You Don’t Need a .com
As frustrating as it may be to seek out a .com you’re happy with, nothing says “late to the party” like a .biz domain.
A .co extension is slightly better in some regions because the .co.** format is commonly used; .co.jp for example. However, .co tends to be typed as .com by users accustomed to the more common format.
nothing says “late to the party” like a .biz domain
It’s possible to opt for pun-based names using regionally specific TLDs like buy.it, or join.in. This kind of strategy will play havoc with your local search strategy because computers don’t understand puns; you’ll potentially do quite well in Italy or India, though.
If you’re registering a domain for a non-profit, then .org is perfectly acceptable. However, carefully consider whether a domain is worth the lost traffic if you can’t also register the .com (because people will type .com).
The one exception is industry-specific TLDs that communicate something about the domain’s contents to a target demographic. For example, .design is a great extension for designers, and .io is fine for an app if it targets developers (i.e., people who understand the joke). You should also register the .com if you can, and if you can’t, carefully consider whom you’re likely to be competing with for SERPs.
This is not to say that anything other than a .com is worthless, just worth less than the .com.
Myth 5: A Trademark Entitles You to Register a Domain
Trademark registration and domain registration are two entirely different processes, and one does not entitle you to the other. This has been legally challenged a few times and fails far more often than it succeeds.
Trademarks are rarely blanket registrations, which means the trademark owner needs to declare the industry in which it will operate; there was no enmity between Apple Inc. and Apple Corp Ltd. until the former moved into music publishing and no one could download the White Album onto their iPod.
There is, however, a limited value in registering a domain that has been trademarked elsewhere. Not least because you will be competing against their SEO, and if they’re big enough to trademark a name, they’ve probably grabbed the .com.
Myth 6: Premium Domains Are a Good Investment
Premium domains are domains that have been speculatively registered in the hope of attracting a huge resale fee. The process is commonly referred to as ‘domain squatting.’
Domain squatters bulk-register domains in the hope that one of them will be valuable to someone. As a result, they are forced to charge exorbitant fees to cover their losses; a premium domain will cost anything from 1000–100,000% of the actual registration cost.
Setting aside the cost — which would be better spent on marketing — premium domains often come with legacy issues, such as a troubled search engine history, that you do not want to inherit.
Myth 7: A Matching Handle Must be Available on Social Media
The business value of a social media account varies from company to company and from platform to platform. Even if it is valuable to you, numerous marketing strategies will accommodate a domain name: prepending with ‘use,’ or ‘get,’ or appending with ‘hq,’ for example.
More importantly, it’s unwise to allow a third-party to define your long-term brand identity; sure, Facebook is huge now, but then so was the T-Rex.
Myth 8: You Need a Domain Name
A domain name is an alias, nothing more. You don’t actually need a domain name — what you need is an IP address, which a domain name makes human-friendly.
Think of domain names as an accessibility issue; humans are less able to read IP addresses than computers, and domains bridge the gap. (See how helpful accessibility is?)
While a domain name is beneficial, question whether a sub-domain or even an IP address would do. Registering a domain is an exciting stage of a project that many people never get past, leaving themselves with a huge collection of domains that they pay an annual fee for, and never actually develop.
What Makes a Good Domain Name
Now we’ve dispelled some of the myths surrounding domain names, let’s look at the key characteristics shared by good domain names:
A Good Domain Name is Brandable
A brandable domain is non-generic. It’s the difference between a sticky-plaster and a band-aid. Unique is good, rare is acceptable, generic is a waste of money.
A Good Domain Name is Flexible
Keep it flexible. Don’t tie yourself to one market or one demographic. Your domain name needs to work now and fifty years in the future.
A Good Domain Name is Musical
Six to 12 characters and two to three syllables is the sweet spot. Names in that range have a musical rhythm our brains find it easier to retain and recall.
A Good Domain Name is Phonetic
There are 44 word sounds in the English language. Other languages have similar totals. If you use a domain name that is pronounced phonetically, it will be easy to communicate.
Source
The post 8 Domain Name Myths Every Web Designer Should Know first appeared on Webdesigner Depot.
Source de l’article sur Webdesignerdepot
SAP Labs France obtient la note de 93/100 à l’Index de l’égalité femmes-hommes
Actualités, ERP & Applications, Ressources Humaines, SAP, UncategorizedL’égalité professionnelle entre les femmes et les hommes passe par une mobilisation de tous. L’index de l’égalité femmes-hommes mesure les écarts de salaire entre ces derniers pour lutter contre les irrégularités, cause nationale du quinquennat du Président de la République.
SAP Labs France a placé la mixité et la parité au cœur de sa stratégie d’entreprise depuis plusieurs années. Cette stratégie engagée permet aujourd’hui à SAP Labs France d’afficher un Index de 93/100.
Cet index propose une note globale de 100 points, sur la base de cinq critères :
L’index met en lumière l’avance de SAP Labs France sur 4 des 5 indicateurs, avec une amélioration sur l’aspect mixité des dix plus hauts salaires et un maintien des notes maximales sur les aspects d’augmentation salariale et de promotion, mais également sur les augmentations salariales pour les femmes au retour de congé maternité. Celles-ci sont systématiques chez SAP Labs France et ancrées dans ses pratiques.
Parce que mixité et égalité sont des valeurs fondamentales nécessaires au développement personnel et professionnel de ses équipes, SAP Labs France réaffirme son engagement à atteindre une équité à tous les niveaux et dans tous les métiers.
The post SAP Labs France obtient la note de 93/100 à l’Index de l’égalité femmes-hommes appeared first on SAP France News.
Source de l’article sur sap.com
Cyberattaque visant Oloron-Sainte-Marie : Le secteur de la santé de nouveau visé
Actualités, Sécurité de l'information et du SI, Sécurité de l’information, Sécurité du système d’informationLe centre hospitalier d’Oloron-Sainte-Marie a confirmé avoir été victime d’une attaque par rançongiciel perturbant fortement son système informatique. Les attaquants ont paralysé une partie de données informatiques et demandent une rançon de 50 000 dollars en échange.
The post Cyberattaque visant Oloron-Sainte-Marie : Le secteur de la santé de nouveau visé first appeared on UnderNews.
Source de l’article sur UNDERNEWS
Capgemini pilote sa croissance mondiale par le recrutement de talents externes hautement qualifiés avec les solutions SAP Fieldglass
Actualités, ERP & Applications, SAPWALLDORF, Allemagne – 09 mars 2021 – SAP SE (NYSE : SAP) vient d’annoncer que Capgemini a adopté les applications SAP Fieldglass Contingent Workforce Management et SAP Fieldglass Services Procurement. En gérant plus efficacement son personnel hautement qualifié, Capgemini a étendu ses capacités de service, notamment dans des secteurs de niche, afin de réaliser son ambition de croissance durable.
Les applications SAP Fieldglass permettent à Capgemini d’être plus flexible pour appuyer et élargir son large portefeuille de services, gérer les questions de conformité et accroitre son efficacité. Avec une main-d’œuvre externe croissante jouant un rôle de plus en plus important dans l’accompagnement de la transformation des activités de ses clients, Capgemini a cherché à améliorer sa visibilité sur son personnel externe. Le département Achats de la société a déployé les applications SAP Fieldglass pour automatiser et normaliser le sourcing, l’engagement, la gestion et la rémunération de ses collaborateurs externes. La société a choisi les solutions SAP Fieldglass pour soutenir son organisation mondiale, lui permettant de fournir un processus simplifié et plus agile dans l’ensemble de l’entreprise.
« Dans notre secteur en pleine évolution, il est essentiel d’exploiter les bonnes capacités au bon moment pour fournir le service de haute qualité que nos clients attendent », a déclaré Andreas Hettwer, directeur de la catégorie « achats groupés » chez Capgemini. « Les applications SAP Fieldglass offrent une combinaison adéquate de fonctionnalités avancées et une expérience utilisateur moderne qui nous permet d’accéder à nos principaux collaborateurs à travers le monde, ce qui nous donne un avantage concurrentiel qui fait progresser notre entreprise et nous aide à offrir plus de valeur à nos clients ».
Les applications SAP Fieldglass Contingent Workforce Management et SAP Fieldglass Services Procurement aident Capgemini à transformer la façon dont le travail est effectué pour répondre aux besoins de son entreprise en pleine croissance en améliorant :
« Capgemini est un exemple frappant de l’importance croissante du marché du travail temporaire pour l’agilité de la force de travail, la continuité des activités, le succès et l’innovation », a déclaré Tamara Braun, chief customer officer, SAP Intelligent Spend Management. « Les consultants externes sont essentiels à la qualité des services que Capgemini fournit à sa clientèle mondiale. De plus, ses dirigeants comprennent clairement que l’engagement de cette force de travail flexible à grande échelle a un impact positif sur la qualité, la compétitivité et la conformité ».
Pour plus d’informations sur l’approche de Capgemini en matière de gestion des effectifs externes, téléchargez l’étude de cas ou écoutez ce podcast.
The post Capgemini pilote sa croissance mondiale par le recrutement de talents externes hautement qualifiés avec les solutions SAP Fieldglass appeared first on SAP France News.
Source de l’article sur sap.com
Pourquoi l’environnement de cloud hybride est-il complexe à gérer ?
Actualités, Sécurité de l'information et du SI, Sécurité de l’information, Sécurité du système d’informationDe nos jours, tout le monde connaît la vitesse et l’agilité que le cloud promet. Pour autant, les environnements des clients sont rarement homogènes et associent on-premise, cloud public ou privé, virtualisation, etc. Cette complexité engendre de véritables défis en matière de sécurité pour le cloud hybride
The post Pourquoi l’environnement de cloud hybride est-il complexe à gérer ? first appeared on UnderNews.
Source de l’article sur UNDERNEWS