Articles

Editor’s note: This interview with David Linthicum was recorded for Coding Over Cocktails — a podcast by TORO Cloud.

The cloud has changed the way enterprises provision and deploy IT. Although dealing with databases, storage, compute cycles, and other platforms that can be leveraged on-premise still have their place, the cloud has provided a new consumption model that is continuously evolving.

Source de l’article sur DZONE

This week, in a move like something from a particularly eventful episode of The Office, popular project management app company Basecamp banned political and societal discussion in the company’s internal communications.

In a post that has been revised for “clarification,” the company’s co-founder Jason Fried listed six rules for employees: No societal or political discussions at work; No more ‘paternalistic’ benefits; No more committees; No more lingering on past decisions; No more 360 reviews; No forgetting what we do here.

A follow-up post from Heinemeier Hansson notes that Basecamp will still permit discussion of issues deemed central to its business like anti-trust and privacy; certain civil liberties are to be championed, while others, like racism and climate change, are not.

On the surface, it seems reasonable, Fried and co-founder David Heinemeier Hansson would like you to believe that it is. After all, people are paid to work, not soapbox, right?

So why, if they’re the ones being protected, are Basecamp’s employees angry about the move?

It turns out, multiple sources from inside Basecamp are reporting that the ‘political’ and ‘societal’ issues referred to in Fried’s public memo were, in fact, frank and open conversations about Basecamp itself.

As reported by The Verge, way back in 2009, a list of ‘funny’ customer names began circulating at the company — hardly respectful, potentially racist, and certainly inappropriate. The misalignment between co-founders and staff occurred when staff members attempted to hold discrete conversations about this and numerous other diversity and inclusivity failings at the company. Fried’s move appears to be a direct attempt to halt criticism of the status quo at Basecamp.

Basecamp itself is a highly political organization: The co-founders have written several books advocating certain societal change; they even provided a campaign headquarters and substantial donation for a candidate for Chicago mayor. Both co-founders are highly active on social media, using their business positions to elevate their personal views.

The truth is that the solo entrepreneur is an almost mythical beast. Successful startups require contributions from a range of skills and experience beyond any one individual. Jason Fried may be the frontman, strutting up and down the stage in spandex pants, with David Heinemeier Hansson playing lead guitar with his teeth, but behind them, there’s a drummer keeping time, and behind them all, there’s a crew of roadies without whom none of the equipment will arrive, let alone sound good.

Basecamp’s founders argue that the company has a mission, and that mission is to create apps that streamline the workplace. But how can you develop a product that is inclusive if staff cannot discuss what inclusive means? The answer is, you can’t.

Discussing racial bias in advertising or the impact of company wastage, climate change, or gender pay gaps in HR meetings are all political and societal and lead to a healthier, more united company.

As designers, we often say that you cannot not communicate; every decision is a design decision; there is no such thing as “adesign.” Likewise, choosing to be apolitical is itself a political choice. The only way it is feasible to run a company like this is to treat employees like robots (in the word’s original sense).

If employees feel the need to discuss exclusionary policies in the workplace, do the company founders, who benefit from those policies (or they would not be in place), have a moral or legal right to restrict those discussions?

Although it is the first point in Fried’s list that has drawn most ire, it is the fourth item on the list that is most telling: “No more lingering or dwelling on past decisions.” Like a parent answering, “Because I said so,” Fried’s attitude to his staff is laid bare in one statement.

It turns out two wealthy white men would rather their employees not try to change the world or even their workplace.

When Coinbase announced a similar move last year, it lost 5% of its staff. If Basecamp suffered the same loss, it would amount to three people. Hardly a disaster. The question for the founders — who, judging by the number of follow-ups and clarifications they’ve published, are aware the ice they’re on is perilously thin — is whether this kind of controversy creates irreparable reputational damage.

 

Featured image via Pexels.

Source

The post Poll: Is Basecamp Right To Shutdown Politics At Work? first appeared on Webdesigner Depot.


Source de l’article sur Webdesignerdepot

 

“Cette initiative est née de notre profonde conviction que les entreprises, quelle que soit l’industrie, peuvent tirer parti du partage d’experiences.”

 

Il est ingénieur de formation, issu de Polytech’Nice-Sophia. Elle est diplômée en mathématiques appliquées et a validé une thèse en théorie de l’optimisation. Ils mènent leur carrière dans de grandes entreprises technologiques internationales. Et dirigent le Industrial Council of Artificial Intelligence Research (ICAIR). Olena Kushakovska (SAP) et Jean-Michel Sauvage (Amadeus) pilotent ensemble ICAIR depuis 2020. Ils ont une ambition claire pour l’organisation : accélérer le travail sur l’IA en mettant l’accent sur le développement durable. A l’occasion du 1er SAP Sustainability Summit, la directrice générale de SAP Labs France et le directeur R&D pour les solutions Revenue Management d’Amadeus se sont prêtés au jeu de l’interview croisée pour nous donner leur vision de l’IA durable.

  1. Quels sont les principaux avantages de l’IA dans votre secteur ?

Olena Kushakovska : Chez SAP, nous permettons à nos clients de devenir des entreprises intelligentes, d’utiliser les données pour bâtir des entreprises plus performantes, plus résilientes, plus rentables, plus agiles et plus durables. Nous mettons tout en œuvre pour que la réalité de l’entreprise intelligente soit pleinement intégrée avec les fonctionnalités d’Intelligence Artificielle.

Jean-Michel Sauvage : L’IA est une technologie majeure qui offre la meilleure utilisation possible des données et fournit un service plus performant, plus efficace, prévisible, personnalisé et à plus forte valeur ajoutée sur l’ensemble de la chaîne.

  1. Quand, pourquoi et comment vous êtes-vous engagé avec ICAIR ?

Olena : Amadeus et SAP sont membres fondateurs de ICAIR. La décision d’aller de l’avant a été prise entre Gilles Floyrac et moi il y a environ 2 ans. Gilles était le président d’Amadeus Nice à l’époque et la région Côte d’Azur venait de décrocher le label 3IA. Son idée était que les entreprises conduisent l’agenda industriel parallèlement au monde universitaire. Plus de 60 entreprises de la zone ont soutenu le projet 3IA. Nous avons contacté les entreprises que nous pensions intéressées (ex. IBM, ARM, NXP, Thales Alenia Space, Orange) et le “Club” est né. La réunion de mise en place entre les responsables de site pour sceller le club s’est tenue chez Amadeus puis la 1ère session de travail a eu lieu chez SAP en juin 2019.

Jean-Michel : Les techniques d’IA n’étant pas spécifiques à la résolution d’un problème, cette initiative est motivée par la forte conviction que les entreprises, même lorsqu’elles travaillent dans différents secteurs, peuvent bénéficier de l’apprentissage et du partage d’expériences sur les défis auxquels elles sont confrontées sur des problèmes techniques similaires.

« Nous nous efforçons d’utiliser l’IA de manière durable et d’atteindre les objectifs de durabilité de l’ONU au sein du secteur. » Olena KUSHAKOVSKA

  1. Qu’est-ce qui est spécial avec ICAIR ?

Jean-Michel : ICAIR se concentre sur la recherche appliquée, et à ce titre, est un moyen de lier la recherche fondamentale et les résultats académiques à leur application dans un environnement industriel.

Olena : ICAIR est à taille humaine, agile, diversifié, industriel, pratico-pratique, avec des cas d’utilisation réels. Des entreprises leaders dans le monde composent le conseil. Pour autant, il y a un faible niveau d’administration, une faible bureaucratie, mais beaucoup de bonne volonté et un grand écosystème. La bienveillance et le soutien sont sans faille, et l’implication continue !

  1. Pourquoi avoir choisi l’IA durable comme thème du programme ICAIR ? 

Jean-Michel : L’IA s’accompagne de défis, tant en termes de technologie, de puissance de calcul, que de biais d’apprentissage, ou de décisions humainement explicables. Nous pensons que l’IA peut être conçue et utilisée de manière durable et apporter de la valeur d’une manière qui respecte la planète et les communautés.

Olena : On questionne souvent l’IA en termes écologique ou éthique. Nous voulons envisager la durabilité dans un contexte beaucoup plus large, celui des objectifs de durabilité des Nations Unies. La durabilité s’entend comme la capacité de notre génération à atteindre ses objectifs, sans compromettre la capacité de la génération future à atteindre les leurs. Et ce, par rapport à toutes les ressources : naturelles, humaines, économiques. Nos efforts se concentrent sur l’IA durable pour atteindre les objectifs des Nations Unies au sein de l’industrie.

  1. Quel est le champ d’application d’ICAIR ?

Jean-Michel : ICAIR a été pensé de telle sorte que des chercheurs d’entreprises de Sophia Antipolis hébergeant des laboratoires de recherche travaillant dans différents contextes industriels, et sur différents sujets, puissent discuter et échanger leurs points de vue sur des questions communes liées à l’utilisation de l’IA dans leurs industries respectives.

Olena : Notre objectif est de travailler sur des projets communs et d’échanger sur les meilleures pratiques en matière d’apprentissage automatique et d’intelligence artificielle. Cela permettra de faire progresser les recherches en matière d’IA. Enfin, nous comptons utiliser notre puissance commune pour promouvoir la Côte d’Azur en tant que berceau de l’IA durable.

  1. Qu’est-ce qui vous motive personnellement ?

Olena : Ma volonté est de promouvoir notre grande collaboration, dans l’écosystème incroyablement riche sur le plan technologique et intellectuel de la Côte d’Azur, en montrant à nos maisons-mères que cet endroit est vraiment exceptionnel, et y développer une véritable communauté autour de l’IA. Je veux aussi que la France et l’Europe obtiennent la place qu’elles méritent dans le monde en ce qui concerne l’IA, en veillant à ce que l’IA soit utilisée à bon escient, que la Côte d’Azur soit identifiée comme l’endroit idéal pour l’IA durable, et enfin que les gens ne craignent plus l’IA.

Jean-Michel : Je suis un passionné d’aviation et d’informatique. Heureusement pour moi, les voyages et l’aviation en particulier sont des domaines pleins de défis combinatoires, très complexes à résoudre et à optimiser. Chez Amadeus, nous sommes déjà pleinement engagés dans le déploiement de l’IA. Nous sommes également engagés depuis de nombreuses années dans le développement de systèmes ouverts et interopérables, car nous pensons que c’est en combinant les meilleurs services « atomiques » que nous apporterons une plus grande valeur ajoutée à nos clients, à l’industrie du voyage et aux voyageurs. Mais nous savons aussi que, comme toute évolution de ce genre, elle a besoin de temps, d’expérience, de tests et d’apprentissage. L’IA s’accompagne de nombreuses questions et défis sans réponse. Avec ICAIR, nous faisons partie de l’apprentissage, de l’enseignement, et nous voulons y répondre de la bonne manière.

 

 

 

Les membres sont des entreprises internationales avec des sites sur la Côte d’Azur et menant des recherches en IA :

  • Accenture,
  • ACRI-ST,
  • AIRFRANCE KLM,
  • Amadeus,
  • ARM,
  • Hewlett Packard Enterprise,
  • IBM,
  • NXP Semiconductors,
  • Orange,
  • Renault Software Labs,
  • SAP Labs France,
  • STMicroelectronics,
  • Thales Alenia Space.

Le programme touche l’ensemble de l’écosystème du label 3IA de la Côte d’Azur :

  • Académiques : Institut 3IA, UCA (Université Côte d’Azur), Ecoles, Centres de Recherche
  • Secteurs d’activité : ICAIR, ClusterIA
  • Institutions : MIA, OTESIA, EuropIA
  • Associations : Telecom Valley, Pôle SCS

Des initiatives liées à l’IA lancées par ces acteurs soutiennent la dynamique territoriale de la Côte d’Azur. Elles se rapportent aux objectifs de développement durable des Nations unies et constituent le champ d’application du programme « IA durable ».

En savoir plus : ICAIR – Industrial Council of Artificial Intelligence Research

The post SAP et Amadeus pilotent le conseil industriel pour la recherche en intelligence artificielle appeared first on SAP France News.

Source de l’article sur sap.com

Photo by Oskar Yildiz on Unsplash.

When building integration components, it’s almost a given that we will have to process data in different formats like JSON, XML, YAML, etc. It’s imperative that any integration product should have very good support for handling these data formats. This kind of robust support for handling data in different formats makes the product flexible to be adapted to different use cases.

In this article, we will look into the support provided by Kumologica for handling the data in these different formats.

Source de l’article sur DZONE


Introduction: EnRoute Helm Chart

Helm is a popular package manager choice for Kubernetes. Installation of software, managing versions, upgrading versions, and finding charts from the registry are key benefits of Helm.

EnRoute helm chart installs the EnRoute Ingress Controller and provides easy configuration options to define policy for a service. The helm chart provides fine-grained control to define L7 policies with its ability to enable/disable plugins for a service using configuration options that can be specified when the helm is invoked.

Source de l’article sur DZONE


Overview

The formula is the heart of an Excel file. And of course, we all want to do correct calculations and deliver accurate results. When there is something wrong, we want to trace back to those referenced cells to find the root cause. Excel natively has a built-in convenient formula dependent/precedent trace feature, it highlights the dependent/precedent cells and displays arrows to indicate the relationships. This helps users to trace back and find any error formulas easily.

Now, when bringing the spreadsheet online, we can do more. We can display the relationships in a custom way that is most useful according to the application context, or bring them to a different service or application for doing the validation programmatically.

Source de l’article sur DZONE

Every day design fans submit incredible industry stories to our sister-site, Webdesigner News. Our colleagues sift through it, selecting the very best stories from the design, UX, tech, and development worlds and posting them live on the site.

The best way to keep up with the most important stories for web professionals is to subscribe to Webdesigner News or check out the site regularly. However, in case you missed a day this week, here’s a handy compilation of the top curated stories from the last seven days. Enjoy!

Coca-Cola Presents New Packaging Design

Seven Mistakes To Avoid In Your Technical Interviews

10 Interesting Ways to Plan Web Design Projects

Web Developer’s Guide To AVIF Images

 

3 Effective Ways To Improve Your Site’s Carbon Footprint

Pure CSS Before & After Image Slider

Blank

25 Exciting New Tools For Designers, April 2021

Text In A Circle Using CSS & JavaScript

A to Z of Adobe XD: Tips & Tricks!

Content-Aware Image Resizing In JavaScript

Remove Distractions and Waste from Your Website

Top 18 Best Practices for Writing Super Readable Code

Atriom

Source

The post Popular Design News Of The Week: April 19, 2021 – April 25, 2021 first appeared on Webdesigner Depot.


Source de l’article sur Webdesignerdepot

Gartner predicts that by 2023, over 50% of medium to large enterprises will have adopted a Low-code/No-code application as part of their platform development.
The proliferation of Low-code/No-code tooling can be partially attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has put pressure on businesses around the world to rapidly implement digital solutions. However, adoption of these tools — while indeed accelerated by the pandemic — would have occurred either way.
Even before the pandemic, the largest, richest companies had already formed an oligopsony around the best tech talent and most advanced development tools. Low-Code/No-code, therefore, is an attractive solution for small and mid-sized organizations to level the playing field, and it does so by giving these smaller players the power to do more with their existing resources.
While these benefits are often realized in the short term, the long-term effect of these tools is often shockingly different. The promise of faster and cheaper delivery is the catch — or lure — inside this organizational mousetrap, whereas backlogs, vendor contracts, technical debts, and constant updates are the hammer.
So, what exactly is the No-Code trap, and how can we avoid it?

What is a No-Code Tool?

First, let’s make sure we clear up any confusion regarding naming. So far I have referred Low-Code and No-Code as if they were one term. It’s certainly easy to confuse them — even large analyst firms seem to have a hard time differentiating between the two — and in the broader context of this article, both can lead to the same set of development pitfalls.
Under the magnifying glass, however, there are lots of small details and capabilities that differentiate Low-code and No-code solutions. Most of them aren’t apparent at the UI level, leading to much of the confusion between where the two come from.
In this section, I will spend a little bit of time exploring the important differences between those two, but only to show that when it comes to the central premise of this article they are virtually equivalent.

Low-Code vs. No-Code Tools

The goal behind Low-Code is to minimize the amount of coding necessary for complex tasks through a visual interface (such as Drag ‘N’ Drop) that integrates existing blocks of code into a workflow.
Skilled professionals have the potential to work smarter and faster with Low-Code tools because repetitive coding or duplicating work is streamlined. Through this, they can spend less time on the 80% of work that builds the foundation and focuses more on optimizing the 20% that makes it different. It, therefore, takes on the role of an entry-level employee doing the grunt work for more senior developers/engineers.
No-Code has a very similar look and feel to Low-Code, but is different in one very important dimension. Where Low-Code is meant to optimize the productivity of developers or engineers that already know how to code (even if just a little), No-Code is built for business and product managers that may not know any actual programming languages. It is meant to equip non-technical workers with the tools they need to create applications without formal development training.
No-Code applications need to be self-contained and everything the No-Code vendor thinks the user may need is already built into the tool.
As a result, No-Code applications create a lot of restrictions for the long-term in exchange for quick results in the short-term. This is a great example of a ‘deliberate-prudent’ scenario in the context of the Technical Debt Quadrant, but more on this later.

Advantages of No-Code Solutions

The appeal of both Low-Code and No-Code is pretty obvious. By removing code organizations can remove those that write it — developers — because they are expensive, in short supply, and fundamentally don’t produce things quickly.
The benefits of these two forms of applications in their best forms can be pretty substantial:
  • Resources: Human Capital is becoming increasingly scarce — and therefore expensive. This can stop a lot of ambitious projects dead in their tracks. Low-Code and No-Code tools minimize the amount of specialized technical skills needed to get an application of the ground, which means things can get done more quickly and at a lower cost.
  • Low Risk/High ROISecurity processes, data integrations, and cross-platform support are all built into Low-Code and No-Code tools, meaning less risk and more time to focus on your business goals.
  • Moving to Production: Similarly, for both types of tools a single click is all it takes to send or deploy a model or application you built to production.
Looking at these advantages, it is no wonder that both Low-Code and No-Code have been taking industries by storm recently. While being distinctly different in terms of users, they serve the same goal — that is to say, faster, safer and cheaper deployment. Given these similarities, both terms will be grouped together under the ‘No-Code’ term for the rest of this article unless otherwise specified.

List of No-Code Data Tools

So far, we have covered the applications of No-Code in a very general way, but for the rest of this article, I would like to focus on data modeling. No-Code tools are prevalent in software development, but have also, in particular, started to take hold in this space, and some applications even claim to be an alternative to SQL and other querying languages (crazy, right?!). My reasons for focusing on this are two-fold: 
Firstly, there is a lot of existing analysis around this problem for software development and very little for data modeling. Secondly, this is also the area in which I have the most expertise.
Now let’s take a look at some of the vendors that provide No-Code solutions in this space. These in no way constitute a complete list and are, for the most part, not exclusively built for data modeling. 

1. No-Code Data Modeling in Power BI

Power BI was created by Microsoft and aims to provide interactive visualizations and business intelligence capabilities to all types of business users. Their simple interface is meant to allow end-users to create their own reports and dashboards through a number of features, including data mapping, transformation, and visualization through dashboards. Power BI does support some R coding capabilities for visualization, but when it comes to data modeling, it is a true No-Code tool.

2. Alteryx as a Low-Code Alternative

Alteryx is meant to make advanced analytics accessible to any data worker. To achieve this, it offers several data analytics solutions. Alteryx specializes in self-service analytics with an intuitive UI. Their offerings can be used as Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) Tools within their own framework. Alteryx allows data workers to organize their data pipelines through their custom features and SQL code blocks. As such, they are easily identified as a Low-Code solution.

3. Is Tableau a No-Code Data Modeling Solution?

Tableau is a visual analytics platform and a direct competitor to Power BI. They were recently acquired by Salesforce which is now hoping to ‘transform the way we use data to solve problems—empowering people and organizations to make the most of their data.’ It is also a pretty obvious No-Code platform that is supposed to appeal to all types of end-users. As of now, it offers fewer tools for data modeling than Power BI, but that is likely to change in the future.

4. Looker is a No-Code Alternative to SQL

Looker is a business intelligence software and big data analytics platform that promises to help you explore, analyze, and share real-time business analytics easily. Very much in line with Tableau and Power BI, it aims to make non-technical end-users proficient in a variety of data tasks such as transformation, modeling, and visualization.

You might be wondering why I am including so many BI/Visualization platforms when talking about potential alternatives to SQL. After all, these tools are only set up to address an organization’s reporting needs, which constitute only one of the use cases for data queries and SQL. This is certainly a valid point, so allow me to clarify my reasoning a bit more.

While it is true that reporting is only one of many potential uses for SQL, it is nevertheless an extremely important one. There is a good reason why there are so many No-Code BI tools in the market—to address heightening demand from enterprises around the world — and therefore, it is worth taking a closer look at their almost inevitable shortcomings.

Source de l’article sur DZONE