Une publication intéressante sur ITPro qui pose un comparatif des solutions de virtualisation Microsoft Hyper-V et vSphere de VMware.
Tableau de comparaison des basiques de l’hyperviseur :
| System | Resource | Hyper-V (2008 R2) | Hyper-V (2012 R2) | vSphere 5.5 |
| Host | Logical Processors | 64 | 320 | 320 |
| Physical Memory | 1TB | 4TB | 4TB | |
| Virtual CPUs per Host | 512 | 2,048 | 4,096 | |
| VM | Virtual CPUs per VM | 4 | 64 | 64 |
| Memory per VM | 64GB | 1TB | 1TB | |
| Active VMs per Host | 384 | 1,024 | 512 | |
| Guest NUMA | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Cluster | Maximum Nodes | 16 | 64 | 32 |
| Maximum VMs | 1,000 | 8,000 | 4,000 |
Tableau de comparaison de la partie stockage :
| Capability | Hyper-V (2012 R2) | vSphere 5.5 |
| Virtual Fiber Channel | Yes | Yes |
| 3rd Party Multipathing (MPIO) | Yes | Yes (VAMP) |
| Native 4-KB Disk Support | Yes | No |
| Maximum Virtual Disk Size | 64TB VHDX | 62TB VMDK |
| Online Virtual Disk Resize | Yes | Grow Only |
| Offloaded Data Transfer | Yes | Yes (VAAI) |
| Boot from USB | Yes | Yes |
Tableau de comparaison de gestion des ressources :
| Capability | Hyper-V (2012 R2) | vSphere 5.5 |
| Dynamic Memory | Yes | Yes |
| Resource Metering | Yes | Yes |
| Network QoS | Yes | Yes |
| Storage QoS | Yes | Yes |
Tableau de comparaison des caractéristiques réseau :
| Capability | Hyper-V (2012 R2) | vSphere 5.5 |
| Extensible vSwitch | Yes | Yes |
| Private Virtual LAN (PVLAN) | Yes | Yes |
| ARP Spoofing Protection | Yes | vCNS/Partner |
| DHCP Snooping Protection | Yes | vCNS/Partner |
| Virtual Port ACLs | Yes | vCNS/Partner |
| Trunk Mode to Virtual Machines | Yes | Yes |
| Port Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Port Mirroring | Yes | Yes |
Tableau de comparaison des fonctionnalités réseau :
| Capability | Hyper-V (2012 R2) | vSphere 5.1 Ent+ |
| Dynamic Virtual Machine Queue | Yes | NetQueue |
| IPsec Task Offload | Yes | No |
| Virtual Receive Side Scaling | Yes | Yes (VMXNet3) |
| SR-IOV with Live Migration | Yes | Yes (without vMotion) |
| Storage Encryption | Yes (Bitlocker) | No |
Tableau de comparaison des caractéristiques de haute disponibilité :
| Capability | Hyper-V (2012 R2) | vSphere 5.5 |
| VM Live Migration | Yes | Yes |
| VM LM with Compression | Yes | No |
| VM LM over RDMA | Yes | No |
| 1GB Simultaneous Live Migrations | Unlimited | 4 |
| 10GB Simultaneous Live Migrations | Unlimited | 8 |
| Automated Live Migrations (Load) | Yes (VMM) | Yes (DRS) |
| Automated Live Migrations (Power) | Yes (VMM) | Yes (DPM) |
| Live Storage Migration | Yes | Yes |
| Shared Nothing Live Migration | Yes | Yes |
| Nodes per Cluster | 64 | 32 |
| VMs per Cluster | 8,000 | 4,000 |
| Max Size Guest Cluster (iSCSI) | 64 Nodes | 64 Nodes |
| Max Size Guest Cluster (Fibre) | 64 Nodes | 5 Nodes |
| Max Size Guest Cluster (File Based) | 64 Nodes | 0 Nodes |
| Guest Clustering with Live Migration | Yes | No |
| Guest Clustering with Dynamic Memory | Yes | No |
| Guest Cluster with Shared Virtual Disk | Yes | Yes |
Tableau de comparaison des fonctionnalités administratives :
| Capability | Hyper-V (2012 R2) | vSphere 5.5 |
| Live VM Cloning | Yes | Yes |
| Live Migration Upgrades | Yes | Yes |
| Network Virtualization | Yes | vCNS |
| Network Virtualization Gateway | Yes | vCNS |
| Integrated High Availability | Yes | Yes |
| Failover Prioritization | Yes | Yes |
| Affinity Rules | Yes | Yes |
| NIC Teaming | Yes | Yes |
| Guest OS Application Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Cluster-Aware Updating | Yes | Yes |
Tableau de comparaison des fonctionnalités de réplication:
| Replication Capability | Hyper-V Replica (R2) | vSphere Replication |
| Architecture | Inbox with Hypervisor | Virtual Appliance |
| Replication Type | Asynchronous | Asynchronous |
| RTO | 30 secs, 5 mins, 15 mins | 15 Minutes |
| Replication | Tertiary | Secondary |
| Planned Failover | Yes | No |
| Unplanned Failover | Yes | Yes |
| Test Failover | Yes | No |
| Simple Failback Process | Yes | No |
| Automatic Re-IP Address | Yes | No |
| Point in Time Recovery | Yes, 15 points | No |
| Orchestration | Yes, PowerShell, HVRM | No, SRM |
L’article source Hyper-V ou vSphere : Le comparatif | iTPro.fr.
